From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: split kobject creation and hotplug event generation
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:56:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050301075626.GA3890@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050228202443.GA25248@vrfy.org>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:24:43PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:46:42AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:53:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > This splits the implicit generation of a hotplug events from
> > > kobject_add() and kobject_del(), to give the user of of these
> > > functions control over the time the event is created.
> > >
> > > The kobject_register() and unregister functions still have the same
> > > behavior and emit the events by themselves.
> > >
> > > The class, block and device core is changed now to emit the hotplug
> > > event _after_ the "dev" file, the "device" symlink and the default
> > > attributes are created. This will save udev from spinning in a stat() loop
> > > to wait for the files to appear, which is expensive if we have a lot of
> > > concurrent events.
> >
> > So, does this solve the issue that everyone has been complaining about
> > for years with the hotplug event happening before the sysfs files are
> > present?
>
> I expect most of them, yes. It is not a guarantee, cause drivers can and will
> create attributes at any time. :) But the most interesting default ones, that
> people tend to expect at event time will be there _before_ the event happens.
>
> To get this for the whole system and not only the class+block core, a few remainig
> places that use kobject_register() need to be changed to use kobject_add(), but
> that is a trivial change and nice too, cause it cleans up some error pathes, where
> a device needs to be unregistered in the same function and it emits two completely
> useless events for that.
Ok, I'll add this patch to my queue, feel free to send a follow-on patch
to also fix up this stuff.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-01 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-26 5:53 split kobject creation and hotplug event generation Kay Sievers
2005-02-26 6:03 ` Kay Sievers
2005-02-28 19:46 ` Greg KH
2005-02-28 20:24 ` Kay Sievers
2005-03-01 7:56 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050301075626.GA3890@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox