From: Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@web.de>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: x86_64: 32bit emulation problems
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:19:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503020019.20256.bernd-schubert@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jewtsruie9.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 23:10, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@web.de> writes:
> >> It is most likely some kind of user space problem. I would change
> >> it to int err = stat(dir, &buf);
> >> and then go through it with gdb and see what value err gets assigned.
> >>
> >> I cannot see any kernel problem.
> >
> > The err value will become -1 here.
>
> That's because there are some values in the stat64 buffer delivered by the
> kernel which cannot be packed into the stat buffer that you pass to stat.
> Use stat64 or _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64.
Hmm, after compiling with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 it works fine. But why does
it work without this option on a 32bit kernel, but not on a 64bit kernel?
32bit kernel, 32bit binary: always works
64bit kernel, 64bit binary: always works
64bit kernel, 32bit binary:
- always works on knfsd mount points
- always works with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
- only works on unfs3 mount points with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
Do I really have to write a bug report for every single debian package that
access /etc and /var to make the maintainers recompile it with
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64?
Btw, whats about Suse, are there all packages compiled with this option? ;)
Cheers,
(a completely confused) Bernd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-01 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-28 20:54 x86_64: 32bit emulation problems Bernd Schubert
2005-02-28 21:00 ` Bernd Schubert
2005-03-01 20:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-01 21:07 ` Bernd Schubert
2005-03-01 21:48 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-01 22:30 ` Bernd Schubert
2005-03-01 23:07 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-01 22:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-03-01 22:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-01 23:22 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-03-01 23:19 ` Bernd Schubert [this message]
2005-03-01 23:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-03-01 23:46 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-03-02 8:18 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-02 9:13 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-02 11:33 ` Bernd Schubert
2005-03-02 16:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-02 18:14 ` Bernd Schubert
2005-03-03 9:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-03 21:16 ` Bernd Schubert
2005-03-03 21:32 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-03 21:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-03 21:46 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-03 22:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-03 9:12 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200503020019.20256.bernd-schubert@web.de \
--to=bernd-schubert@web.de \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox