From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262545AbVCBVda (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:33:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262546AbVCBVbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:31:12 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:1199 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262463AbVCBV3W (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:29:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:29:01 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: muthian_s@yahoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3 journal commit performance Message-Id: <20050302132901.45f5b9ee.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050302095852.3d4da20b.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050302165814.70651.qmail@web53704.mail.yahoo.com> <20050302095852.3d4da20b.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > > However, what you are proposing is, I think, > > 1) write the data > 2) write the journal > 3) wait on the data write > 4) wait on the journal write 5) write the commit block 6) wait on the commit block