From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi>
Cc: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, myeatman@vale-housing.co.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gene.heskett@verizon.net
Subject: Re: Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:17:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050302141711.00ec7147.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503022334280.9132@kai.makisara.local>
Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
>
> f seek with tape is changed back to returning success, this would enable
> correct tar --verify at the beginning of the tape. However, I am not sure
> what happens if we are not at the beginning. I will investigate this and
> suggest a long term fix to the tar people (a fix that should be compatible
> with all Unix tape semantics I know) and also suggest possible fixes to st
> (this may include automatic writing of a filemark when BSF is used after
> writes).
Yes, please let's get a tar fix in the pipeline.
GNU tar must run on a lot of operating systems. It's odd.
> If you think want to make st return success for seeks even if nothing
> happens (as it did earlier), I don't have anything against that. It would
> solve the practical problem several people have reported recently. (My
> recommendation for the people seeing this problem is to do verification
> separately with 'tar -d'.)
Yes, I think we need to grit our teeth and do this. I'll stick a comment
in there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-02 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-02 11:15 Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29 Mark Yeatman
2005-03-02 12:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-02 17:08 ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-02 14:34 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-02 20:46 ` Re[03]: " John L. Males
2005-03-02 21:15 ` John L. Males
2005-03-02 21:26 ` John L. Males
2005-03-02 21:17 ` Kai Makisara
2005-03-02 16:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-02 22:15 ` Kai Makisara
2005-03-02 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02 21:44 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-03-02 22:01 ` Kai Makisara
2005-03-02 22:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-02 16:50 Mark Yeatman
2005-03-02 22:25 John L. Males
2005-03-02 23:51 John L. Males
2005-03-03 8:29 Mark Yeatman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050302141711.00ec7147.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi \
--cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=myeatman@vale-housing.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox