public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi>
Cc: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, myeatman@vale-housing.co.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gene.heskett@verizon.net
Subject: Re: Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:17:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050302141711.00ec7147.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503022334280.9132@kai.makisara.local>

Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
>
> f seek with tape is changed back to returning success, this would enable 
> correct tar --verify at the beginning of the tape. However, I am not sure 
> what happens if we are not at the beginning. I will investigate this and 
> suggest a long term fix to the tar people (a fix that should be compatible 
> with all Unix tape semantics I know) and also suggest possible fixes to st 
> (this may include automatic writing of a filemark when BSF is used after 
> writes).

Yes, please let's get a tar fix in the pipeline.

GNU tar must run on a lot of operating systems.  It's odd.

> If you think want to make st return success for seeks even if nothing 
> happens (as it did earlier), I don't have anything against that. It would 
> solve the practical problem several people have reported recently. (My 
> recommendation for the people seeing this problem is to do verification 
> separately with 'tar -d'.)

Yes, I think we need to grit our teeth and do this.  I'll stick a comment
in there.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-02 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-02 11:15 Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29 Mark Yeatman
2005-03-02 12:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-02 17:08   ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-02 14:34     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-02 20:46       ` Re[03]: " John L. Males
2005-03-02 21:15         ` John L. Males
2005-03-02 21:26           ` John L. Males
2005-03-02 21:17   ` Kai Makisara
2005-03-02 16:59     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-02 22:15       ` Kai Makisara
2005-03-02 21:25     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02 21:44       ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-03-02 22:01       ` Kai Makisara
2005-03-02 22:17         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-02 16:50 Mark Yeatman
2005-03-02 22:25 John L. Males
2005-03-02 23:51 John L. Males
2005-03-03  8:29 Mark Yeatman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050302141711.00ec7147.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi \
    --cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
    --cc=myeatman@vale-housing.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox