From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
paul.devriendt@amd.com
Subject: Re: BIOS overwritten during resume (was: Re: Asus L5D resume on battery power)
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:02:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503030902.48038.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050302235456.GB1439@elf.ucw.cz>
Hi,
On Thursday, 3 of March 2005 00:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > It seems that we write to the BIOS while moving the image, at least on my box,
> > > > which is quite not correct, IMO.
> > [-- snip --]
> > > >
> > > > IMO this may lead to unexpected results, like the mysterious reboots during
> > > > resume.
> > >
> > > Well, I always thought that ROM-BIOS is expected to
> > > be... well... read-only? Can you really write to your BIOS? [I know
> > > about Flash-BIOSen, but they are certainly not writable by "normal"
> > > write.] Plus we should overwrite it with same values...
> > >
> > > Anyway, IMO bios should be marked as reserved (and we should not be
> > > touching reserved pages). Can you verify that your BIOS is properly
> > > marked reserved? [Ccing l-k, this might be interesting.]
> >
> > It is, but that's even more interesting. Namely, the BIOS-e820 memory map
> > looks as follows:
> >
> > BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> > BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
> > BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001ff40000 (usable)
> > BIOS-e820: 000000001ff40000 - 000000001ff50000 (ACPI data)
> > BIOS-e820: 000000001ff50000 - 0000000020000000 (ACPI NVS)
> > BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
> >
> > and the pages in the first two reserved areas are properly marked as reserved.
> > Moreover, there is an apparent hole between a0000 and e0000 which also
> > is marked as reserved. However, we treat all of these pages as saveable
> > (a page is treated as non-saveable if it is marked as reserved _and_ satisfies
> > specific condition which is met by only one page on my system). Consequently,
> > during resume we try to overwrite all of these pages and we not only try to
> > write to (theoretically) read-only areas, but also we try to write to where there's
> > nothing. :-)
> >
> > Still, there are almost 3500 reserved pages on my system and I'm not sure that
> > we don't need to save at least some of them. Anyway, I'm attaching the full
> > list of pages that are marked as reserved and treated as saveable, so they get
> > overwritten during resume. Please have a look (these are virtual x86-64
> > addresses, but the mapping is straightforward).
>
> [looking at code]
>
> IIRC kernel code/data is marked as PageReserved(), that's why we need
> to save that :(. Not sure what to do with data e820 marked as
> reserved...
Perhaps we need another page flag, like PG_readonly, and mark the pages
reserved by the e820 as PG_reserved | PG_readonly (the same for the areas
that are not returned by e820 at all). Would that be acceptable?
Greets,
Rafael
--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-03 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200502252237.04110.rjw@sisk.pl>
[not found] ` <20050227170253.GH1441@elf.ucw.cz>
[not found] ` <200502271919.45767.rjw@sisk.pl>
[not found] ` <200503022250.12823.rjw@sisk.pl>
2005-03-02 22:05 ` BIOS overwritten during resume (was: Re: Asus L5D resume on battery power) Pavel Machek
2005-03-02 23:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-02 23:54 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-03 8:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2005-03-04 11:04 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-04 13:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-04 14:44 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-04 20:11 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-04 23:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-04 23:37 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-05 0:51 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-03-04 23:41 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-05 1:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-05 9:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-06 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-06 19:41 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-06 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-04 14:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-05 18:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200503030902.48038.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.devriendt@amd.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox