The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	paul.devriendt@amd.com
Subject: Re: BIOS overwritten during resume (was: Re: Asus L5D resume on battery power)
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:02:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503030902.48038.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050302235456.GB1439@elf.ucw.cz>

Hi,

On Thursday, 3 of March 2005 00:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > It seems that we write to the BIOS while moving the image, at least on my box,
> > > > which is quite not correct, IMO.
> > [-- snip --]
> > > > 
> > > > IMO this may lead to unexpected results, like the mysterious reboots during
> > > > resume.
> > > 
> > > Well, I always thought that ROM-BIOS is expected to
> > > be... well... read-only? Can you really write to your BIOS? [I know
> > > about Flash-BIOSen, but they are certainly not writable by "normal"
> > > write.] Plus we should overwrite it with same values...
> > > 
> > > Anyway, IMO bios should be marked as reserved (and we should not be
> > > touching reserved pages). Can you verify that your BIOS is properly
> > > marked reserved? [Ccing l-k, this might be interesting.]
> > 
> > It is, but that's even more interesting.  Namely, the BIOS-e820 memory map
> > looks as follows:
> > 
> > BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> >  BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
> >  BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
> >  BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
> >  BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001ff40000 (usable)
> >  BIOS-e820: 000000001ff40000 - 000000001ff50000 (ACPI data)
> >  BIOS-e820: 000000001ff50000 - 0000000020000000 (ACPI NVS)
> >  BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved)
> >  BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
> > 
> > and the pages in the first two reserved areas are properly marked as reserved.
> > Moreover, there is an apparent hole between a0000 and e0000 which also
> > is marked as reserved.  However, we treat all of these pages as saveable
> > (a page is treated as non-saveable if it is marked as reserved _and_ satisfies
> > specific condition which is met by only one page on my system).  Consequently,
> > during resume we try to overwrite all of these pages and we not only try to
> > write to (theoretically) read-only areas, but also we try to write to where there's
> > nothing. :-)
> > 
> > Still, there are almost 3500 reserved pages on my system and I'm not sure that
> > we don't need to save at least some of them.  Anyway, I'm attaching the full
> > list of pages that are marked as reserved and treated as saveable, so they get
> > overwritten during resume.  Please have a look (these are virtual x86-64
> > addresses, but the mapping is straightforward).
> 
> [looking at code]
> 
> IIRC kernel code/data is marked as PageReserved(), that's why we need
> to save that :(. Not sure what to do with data e820 marked as
> reserved...

Perhaps we need another page flag, like PG_readonly, and mark the pages
reserved by the e820 as PG_reserved | PG_readonly (the same for the areas
that are not returned by e820 at all).  Would that be acceptable?

Greets,
Rafael


-- 
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
		-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-03  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200502252237.04110.rjw@sisk.pl>
     [not found] ` <20050227170253.GH1441@elf.ucw.cz>
     [not found]   ` <200502271919.45767.rjw@sisk.pl>
     [not found]     ` <200503022250.12823.rjw@sisk.pl>
2005-03-02 22:05       ` BIOS overwritten during resume (was: Re: Asus L5D resume on battery power) Pavel Machek
2005-03-02 23:47         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-02 23:54           ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-03  8:02             ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2005-03-04 11:04               ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-04 13:15                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-04 14:44                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-04 20:11                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-04 23:26                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-04 23:37                       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-05  0:51                         ` Bernard Blackham
2005-03-04 23:41                       ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-05  1:10                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-05  9:08                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-06 17:29                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-06 19:41                           ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-06 21:53                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-04 14:21                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-05 18:43                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200503030902.48038.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.devriendt@amd.com \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox