Re: [PATCH] trivial fix for 2.6.11 raid6 compilation on ppc w/ Altivec

Greg KH
2005-03-03T20:38:34Z

On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 12:07:18PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com) wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Two procedural suggestions...
> >
> > >Ok, I've fixed up the patch and applied it to a local tree that I've set
> > >up to catch these things (it will live at
> > >bk://kernel.bkbits.net:gregkh/linux-2.6.11.y until Chris Wright and I
> > >set up how we are going to handle all of this.)
> >
> > My suggestion would be one of two alternatives:
> >
> > 1) At each release, Linus clones
> > linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6
> > to
> > linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6.11
> >
> > and gives the "release team" access to push to linux-2.6.11 repo.
>
> My recollection of the bkbits interface is that it's keys are good for a
> "project" dir. So I don't know if it would work like you suggested.
>
> > 2) Create linux-release.bkbits.net, and some non-Linus person clones
> > linux-2.6 at release time to linux-2.6.11.
>
> This is closer to what I suggested to Greg (although I like your name
> better).

I like this too, less work for Linus to do this.

Ok, linux-release.bkbits.net is now created.

> > >Feel free to start pointing stuff like this at me and chris (we'll also
> > >be setting up an alias for it.)
> >
> > I was wondering if it would be possible to setup a list on vger that is
> > public, but read-only to everyone but the $sucker team.

So, the $sucker team can't read it, but the rest of the world could? :)

> Don't see why not, we were thinking of making it just an alias at
> kernel.org.

An alias would probably be easier, unless you think everything sent
there should be archived?

thanks,

greg k-h