From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Todd Poynor <tpoynor@mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Custom power states for non-ACPI systems
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:31:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050304083148.GA1345@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503031801.25231.david-b@pacbell.net>
Hi!
> > These are expected to be system states, and sleeping system
> > does not take calls, etc...
>
> Pavel, remember that great big "wakeup" shaped hole in the
> current PM framework... ? Even ACPI sleep states support
> wakeup mechanisms, although not well under Linux (yet).
Umm, yes, I see that one.
> One way a sleeping system could take a call is if some
> external chip raised a wakeup-enabled IRQ to wake up the
> system. And if going from deep sleep to normal operational
> state has a low cost, why shouldn't the system routinely
> enter deep sleep instead of going to CPU idle state?
But in such case /sys/power/sleep is wrong interface to trigger
this. Imagine system taking short sleeps 10 times a second. You don't
want to trigger that using /sys/power/sleep [because it would switch
your consoles].
But yes, I see the fine line... If it turns display off and waits for
incoming call, yes, there /sys/power/sleep makes sense. Someone get me
Linux phone or tell me where to buy one so I can see the fine points
better ;-).
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-04 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-02 2:03 [PATCH] Custom power states for non-ACPI systems Todd Poynor
2005-03-02 2:41 ` Todd Poynor
2005-03-02 2:57 ` [linux-pm] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-02 8:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-02 21:58 ` Todd Poynor
2005-03-02 22:11 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-03 0:26 ` Todd Poynor
2005-03-03 14:55 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-04 2:01 ` David Brownell
2005-03-04 8:31 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-03-04 2:10 ` Todd Poynor
2005-03-04 2:17 ` David Brownell
2005-03-04 4:49 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-04 6:31 ` David Brownell
2005-03-04 20:50 ` Todd Poynor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050304083148.GA1345@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=tpoynor@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox