public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Todd Poynor <tpoynor@mvista.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Custom power states for non-ACPI systems
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:31:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050304083148.GA1345@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503031801.25231.david-b@pacbell.net>

Hi!

> > These are expected to be system states, and sleeping system
> > does not take calls, etc...
> 
> Pavel, remember that great big "wakeup" shaped hole in the
> current PM framework... ?  Even ACPI sleep states support
> wakeup mechanisms, although not well under Linux (yet).

Umm, yes, I see that one.

> One way a sleeping system could take a call is if some
> external chip raised a wakeup-enabled IRQ to wake up the
> system.  And if going from deep sleep to normal operational
> state has a low cost, why shouldn't the system routinely
> enter deep sleep instead of going to CPU idle state?

But in such case /sys/power/sleep is wrong interface to trigger
this. Imagine system taking short sleeps 10 times a second. You don't
want to trigger that using /sys/power/sleep [because it would switch
your consoles].

But yes, I see the fine line... If it turns display off and waits for
incoming call, yes, there /sys/power/sleep makes sense. Someone get me
Linux phone or tell me where to buy one so I can see the fine points
better ;-).
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-04  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-02  2:03 [PATCH] Custom power states for non-ACPI systems Todd Poynor
2005-03-02  2:41 ` Todd Poynor
2005-03-02  2:57 ` [linux-pm] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-02  8:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-02 21:58   ` Todd Poynor
2005-03-02 22:11     ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-03  0:26       ` Todd Poynor
2005-03-03 14:55         ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-04  2:01           ` David Brownell
2005-03-04  8:31             ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-03-04  2:10           ` Todd Poynor
2005-03-04  2:17   ` David Brownell
2005-03-04  4:49     ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-04  6:31       ` David Brownell
2005-03-04 20:50       ` Todd Poynor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050304083148.GA1345@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=tpoynor@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox