From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262773AbVCDLyU (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262802AbVCDLyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:54:19 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:3783 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262785AbVCDL1J (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:27:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:26:49 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Matthew Garrett Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Scheduling while atomic errors on swsusp resume Message-ID: <20050304112649.GQ1345@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1109811404.5918.80.camel@tyrosine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1109811404.5918.80.camel@tyrosine> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Using the current Ubuntu development kernel (2.6.10 with acpi and swsusp > stuff backported from 2.6.11), a user is getting the following trace on > resume. Passing noapic nolapic removes the APIC error, but the rest of > the trace is identical. This is reproducible, but only seems to happen > on this machine. Anyone have any idea what's going on before I head off > to try getting it reproduced with a stock kernel? Well, those are warnings, so it still works, right? Aha, "exited with preempt count 1" seems very wrong. Yes, please try this with vanilla. I'm running 2.6.11 with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL=y and I certainly do not get these ugly warnings. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!