From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11.1
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 02:53:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050305075343.GA20513@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503041627340.11349@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:28:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:36:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > But we end up with a cset in the permanent kernel history which simply
> > > should not have been there.
> >
> > Is this really a big deal?
>
> Once? No. If it ends up being "par for the course", it's bad.
The amount of stuff in the sucker tree shouldn't really amount
to /that/ many patches should it ? If it does, then 2.6.x is in
worse shape than we've all been admitting.
Would it be that much work to just send the 'meat' as gnu patches,
and leave the not-for-linus stuff alone ?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-05 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-04 17:53 Linux 2.6.11.1 Greg KH
2005-03-04 17:53 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 20:34 ` Ian Pilcher
2005-03-04 22:29 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 20:58 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 21:43 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 22:08 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-04 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 22:05 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-05 0:06 ` Greg KH
2005-03-05 0:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-05 7:53 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2005-03-06 5:05 ` Greg KH
2005-03-05 1:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-06 5:03 ` Greg KH
2005-03-05 9:51 ` Russell King
2005-03-05 17:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-05 17:46 ` Russell King
2005-03-05 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-05 21:49 ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-05 22:06 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-05 23:26 ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-07 17:18 ` Alan Cox
2005-03-08 20:16 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-05 17:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 18:22 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-05 0:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 21:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-04 21:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 21:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 7:11 ` James Bourne
2005-03-08 22:07 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-03-08 22:41 ` Chris Wright
2005-03-04 21:50 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-04 23:35 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-03-04 20:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-04 20:53 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-05 18:32 ` L. A. Walsh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-04 19:28 Paolo
2005-03-04 19:55 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 20:01 ` Paolo
2005-03-04 20:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 6:16 Shawn Starr
2005-03-06 5:06 ` Greg KH
2005-03-07 4:01 ` Shawn Starr
2005-03-07 3:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050305075343.GA20513@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox