Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

Greg KH
2005-03-05T17:49:13Z

On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:58:00AM +0000, Adam Sampson wrote:
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
>
> > - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
> > marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue.
>
> So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be
> accepted?

Good point, I've now added that.

thanks,

greg k-h