Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-03-05T08:20:12Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 476 bytes --]

On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:08:55 CST, Ian Pilcher said:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > Anything else anyone can think of? Any objections to any of these?
> > I based them off of Linus's original list.
>
> Must already be in Linus tree (i.e. 2.6.X+1)?

Not workable. There's a high probability that we hit a bug where Linus
commits a more extensive "correct" solution, but 2.6.X.1 includes a much
simpler band-aid that's technically bogus, but stops a panic-on-boot bug
from manifesting.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]