From: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
To: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Cc: emoenke@gwdg.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nacc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] 12/34: cdrom/cdu31a: replace interruptible_sleep_on() with wait_event_interruptible()
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:04:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050306210426.GA32564@nd47.coderock.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <422AECBF.7040507@rainbow-software.org>
On 06/03/05 12:42 +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> domen@coderock.org wrote:
> >Use wait_event_interruptible() instead of the deprecated
> >interruptible_sleep_on(). The patch is straight-forward as the macros
> >should result in the same execution. Patch is compile-tested (still throws
> >out warnings
> >regarding {save,restore}_flags()).
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
>
Uh, this one escaped me, as schedule() (sleep_on) after cli() is clearly
wrong. Btw. what was the reason for this?
> I've posted a patch for the cdu31a driver some time ago that removes
> almost all usage of interruptible_sleep_on() and also
> {save,restore}_flags() - it uses semaphore instead.
> The only remaining code is in sony_sleep() function when using
> IRQ-driven operation.
>
> See http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/18/107
> The patch is big because I've messed with the formatting...
I looked at it, and rewrote some of it into smaller patches. If you don't
mind, can i send them to you for review and testing?
Domen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-06 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-06 10:31 [patch 2/6] 12/34: cdrom/cdu31a: replace interruptible_sleep_on() with wait_event_interruptible() domen
2005-03-06 11:42 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-03-06 21:04 ` Domen Puncer [this message]
2005-03-06 22:17 ` Ondrej Zary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050306210426.GA32564@nd47.coderock.org \
--to=domen@coderock.org \
--cc=emoenke@gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox