From: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de,
nacc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] isdn/capi: replace interruptible_sleep_on() with wait_event_interruptible()
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 09:35:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050307083549.GB18117@nd47.coderock.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050306194756.1d24dd0c.akpm@osdl.org>
On 06/03/05 19:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> domen@coderock.org wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Use wait_event_interruptible() instead of the deprecated
> > interruptible_sleep_on(). Patch is straight-forward as current sleep is
> > conditionally looped. Patch is compile-tested.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
> > ---
> >
> >
> > kj-domen/drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c | 9 ++-------
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff -puN drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c~int_sleep_on-drivers_isdn_capi_capi drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c
> > --- kj/drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c~int_sleep_on-drivers_isdn_capi_capi 2005-03-05 16:11:36.000000000 +0100
> > +++ kj-domen/drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c 2005-03-05 16:11:36.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -675,13 +675,8 @@ capi_read(struct file *file, char __user
> > if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> > return -EAGAIN;
> >
> > - for (;;) {
> > - interruptible_sleep_on(&cdev->recvwait);
> > - if ((skb = skb_dequeue(&cdev->recvqueue)) != 0)
> > - break;
> > - if (signal_pending(current))
> > - break;
> > - }
> > + wait_event_interruptible(cdev->recvwait,
> > + ((skb = skb_dequeue(&cdev->recvqueue)) == 0));
> > if (skb == 0)
> > return -ERESTARTNOHAND;
> > }
>
> hmm, OK. Putting an expression with side-effect such as this into a macro
> which evaluates the expression multiple times is a bit of a worry, but it
> appears that everything will work OK.
>
> That being said, I'd prefer that this come in via the ISDN team, after
> having been tested please.
I believe last update from ISDN team was 13 months ago. :-(
And I concur, testing would be great.
Domen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-07 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-06 22:38 [patch 2/8] isdn/capi: replace interruptible_sleep_on() with wait_event_interruptible() domen
2005-03-07 3:47 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-07 8:35 ` Domen Puncer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050307083549.GB18117@nd47.coderock.org \
--to=domen@coderock.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox