Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-05T18:44:08Z

Adam Sampson wrote:
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
>
>
>> - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
>> marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue.
>
>
> So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be
> accepted?
>

That's called a critical patch.

--
~Randy