From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261538AbVCHFoJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:44:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261448AbVCHFmZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:42:25 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:39810 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261271AbVCHFlr (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:41:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:39:41 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Linux Kernel Mailing List , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel Message-ID: <20050308053941.GA16450@kroah.com> References: <200503072216.j27MGxtP024504@hera.kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503072216.j27MGxtP024504@hera.kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:50:19PM +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > ChangeSet 1.1982.132.7, 2005/03/07 13:50:19-08:00, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk > > [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel > > > > pci_ids.h | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > diff -Nru a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h > --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2005-03-07 14:17:11 -08:00 > +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2005-03-07 14:17:11 -08:00 > @@ -352,10 +352,21 @@ > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS300_133 0x5831 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS300_166 0x5832 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS300_200 0x5833 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS350_100 0x7830 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS350_133 0x7831 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS350_166 0x7832 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS350_200 0x7833 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS400_100 0x5a30 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS400_133 0x5a31 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS400_166 0x5a32 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS400_200 0x5a33 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS480 0x5950 Was there a reason you did this without using tabs, like the rest of the file? Again, the maintainer chain is well documented... {sigh} Oh, no Signed-off-by: line either :( greg k-h