The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unified device list allocator
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 22:11:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050308061155.GK3120@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050308055627.GA1515@infradead.org>

On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:56:27AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:50:35PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > register_blkdev only happens at module_init time (and in fact should go
> > > away completely, so I'm not happy wit hthe surgey to keep it barely alive
> > > at all)
> > 
> > Is anyone working on that?
> 
> I had a patch from a long time ago that just killed it, but that one isn't
> useable for current users anymore.
> 
> There's two things it's doing currently:
> 
>  - when called with the major argument as 0 it returns an unused major number
>    from the top of the old 255 entries major list.  This should be replaced
>    by a real dynamic dev_t allocator, similar to alloc_chrdev_region.

Umm, this replaces alloc_chrdev_region too. If instead you mean "let's
migrate all the users to a sensible interface", I agree. And that
means killing alloc_chrdev_region too. (baseminor makes no sense for
dynamic allocation - you either know your prefered major and minor or
you know neither.)

>  - /proc/devices.  This interface has traditionally been used by things
>    like installer but these day's it's totally bogus as the one major, one
>    driver limitation got lifeted.  We'll probably have to deprecate it and
>    kill it in half a year or a similar timespan.

I think killing /proc/devices has to wait until after devfs removal,
when everyone is more or less comfortable with its alternatives.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-08  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-08  5:18 [PATCH] unified device list allocator Matt Mackall
2005-03-08  5:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-08  5:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-08  5:50     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-08  5:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-08  6:11         ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2005-03-08  6:31           ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-08  6:35             ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-08  6:01   ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050308061155.GK3120@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox