From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unified device list allocator
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 22:11:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050308061155.GK3120@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050308055627.GA1515@infradead.org>
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:56:27AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:50:35PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > register_blkdev only happens at module_init time (and in fact should go
> > > away completely, so I'm not happy wit hthe surgey to keep it barely alive
> > > at all)
> >
> > Is anyone working on that?
>
> I had a patch from a long time ago that just killed it, but that one isn't
> useable for current users anymore.
>
> There's two things it's doing currently:
>
> - when called with the major argument as 0 it returns an unused major number
> from the top of the old 255 entries major list. This should be replaced
> by a real dynamic dev_t allocator, similar to alloc_chrdev_region.
Umm, this replaces alloc_chrdev_region too. If instead you mean "let's
migrate all the users to a sensible interface", I agree. And that
means killing alloc_chrdev_region too. (baseminor makes no sense for
dynamic allocation - you either know your prefered major and minor or
you know neither.)
> - /proc/devices. This interface has traditionally been used by things
> like installer but these day's it's totally bogus as the one major, one
> driver limitation got lifeted. We'll probably have to deprecate it and
> kill it in half a year or a similar timespan.
I think killing /proc/devices has to wait until after devfs removal,
when everyone is more or less comfortable with its alternatives.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-08 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-08 5:18 [PATCH] unified device list allocator Matt Mackall
2005-03-08 5:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-08 5:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-08 5:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-08 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-08 6:11 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2005-03-08 6:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-08 6:35 ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-08 6:01 ` Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050308061155.GK3120@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox