From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261369AbVCHWgT (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:36:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261391AbVCHWgS (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:36:18 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:44505 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261369AbVCHWdz (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:33:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:33:53 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Alan Cox Cc: Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel Message-ID: <20050308223353.GA19278@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Alan Cox , Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200503072216.j27MGxtP024504@hera.kernel.org> <20050308053941.GA16450@kroah.com> <1110276929.28860.93.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1110276929.28860.93.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:15:30AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Was there a reason you did this without using tabs, like the rest of the > > file? > > No but I'll send Linus an update to fix that now. > > > Again, the maintainer chain is well documented... > > Really - so does it go to the PCI maintainer, the IDE maintainer or the > DRI maintainer or someone else, or all of them, or in bits to different > ones remembering there are dependancies and I don't use bitcreeper ? If you don't know send it to Andrew.