public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: aio stress panic on 2.6.11-mm1
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:34:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050309110404.GA4088@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18744.1110364438@redhat.com>


Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures) ? Isn't rwsem used very widely ?

Regards
Suparna

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:33:58AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> 
> > If we want to take the spinlock from interrupt context, the non-interrupt
> > context code needs to do spin_lock_irq(), not spin_lock().
> 
> Yeah. I think I had a patch for that somewhere, but I think Linus turned it
> down. I can't find any emails on that subject though. I'll knock together a
> new patch for it.
> 
> David
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
> see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

-- 
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India


       reply	other threads:[~2005-03-09 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20050308170107.231a145c.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found] ` <1110327267.24286.139.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com>
     [not found]   ` <18744.1110364438@redhat.com>
2005-03-09 11:04     ` Suparna Bhattacharya [this message]
2005-03-09 11:05       ` aio stress panic on 2.6.11-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-03-09 11:07       ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-09 11:17         ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-09 11:28         ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-09 11:59           ` David Howells
2005-03-09 12:12           ` [PATCH] rwsem: Make rwsems use interrupt disabling spinlocks David Howells
2005-03-09 17:35             ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-09 19:18               ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-09 19:16             ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-09 19:42               ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-09 20:10                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-11  9:40                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 10:07                     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-11 10:25                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-09 11:10       ` aio stress panic on 2.6.11-mm1 Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-09 11:21         ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-09 14:48           ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-03-09 21:58         ` David Howells
2005-03-09 11:11       ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050309110404.GA4088@in.ibm.com \
    --to=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox