Re: Linux 2.6.11.2

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:28:32AM +0000, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Dominik Karall wrote:
> 
> >>>> which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release.  If consensus arrives
> >>>> that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
> >>>> way in the future.
> >>>
> >>> IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.1, like -rc's that are'nt
> >>> againt
> >>> the last -rc but against 2.6.x.
> >>
> >> It's a stable release, not a pre/rc, so against 2.6.11.1 sounds most
> >> logical to me.
> >
> > I don't think so. The latest patch (2.6.11.2 now) is on the frontpage of
> > kernel.org, so IMHO the user should not need to search the kernel.org/pub
> > archives to get 2.6.11.1 patch before he can start working with 2.6.11.2.
> >
> > I think it's a small problem too, that 2.6.11 source isn't directly accessable
> > through the kernel.org frontpage while there is no "full tarball" of 2.6.11.X
> > trees.
> 
> With that "full tarball" for 2.6.11.X the issues would be over.
> I think there should be one.

There is one, did you not look?

	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.11.2.tar.gz

thanks,

greg k-h