public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
	"Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
	Daniel Staaf <dst@bostream.nu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrei Mikhailovsky <andrei@arhont.com>,
	Ian Campbell <icampbell@arcom.com>,
	Ronald Bultje <rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net>,
	Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] Fix i2c messsage flags in video drivers
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:28:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050309232825.GH5389@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050309225559.061058dd.khali@linux-fr.org>

* Jean Delvare (khali@linux-fr.org) wrote:
> > 
> > Are people reporting this as a problem?
> 
> Not that I know. For adv7175 it couldn't be reported so far anyway
> because people would hit the oops in saa7110 before (same board: DC10+,
> oops fixed in a different patch).

Heh, right.

> It is possible that people are able to get their board to still work
> without my patch, if the chips were properly configured in the first
> place and they don't attempt to reconfigure them (like norm change). I
> don't know the chips well enough to tell how probable this is.

According to offlist mail, it does "fix a bug that bothers people."
So looks like a fine candidate, and is queued up for -stable.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-09 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-05 12:11 amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe Andrei Mikhailovsky
2005-03-06  0:53 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-06 13:33   ` Andrei Mikhailovsky
2005-03-07  3:52     ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-07  5:01     ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-07 21:47     ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-08 19:15       ` Jean Delvare
2005-03-08 19:25         ` [PATCH 2.6] Fix i2c messsage flags in video drivers Jean Delvare
2005-03-09 18:40           ` Chris Wright
2005-03-09 21:55             ` Jean Delvare
2005-03-09 22:40               ` Ronald S. Bultje
2005-03-10 10:56                 ` Jean Delvare
2005-03-10  0:47                   ` Ronald S. Bultje
2005-03-10 11:50                     ` Jean Delvare
2005-03-10  1:33                       ` Ronald S. Bultje
2005-03-09 23:28               ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-03-21 22:47 ` amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe Andrew Morton
2005-05-25 22:24 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050309232825.GH5389@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrei@arhont.com \
    --cc=dst@bostream.nu \
    --cc=icampbell@arcom.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox