From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reading deterministic cache parameters and exporting it in /sysfs
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:36:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050315233620.GC14380@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050315152448.A1697@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 03:24:48PM -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
>
> The attached patch adds support for using cpuid(4) instead of cpuid(2), to get
> CPU cache information in a deterministic way for Intel CPUs, whenever
> supported. The details of cpuid(4) can be found here
>
> IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual (vol 2a)
> (http://developer.intel.com/design/pentium4/manuals/index_new.htm#sdm_vol2a)
> and
> Prescott New Instructions (PNI) Technology: Software Developer's Guide
> (http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/events/43988.htm)
>
> The advantage of using the cpuid(4) ('Deterministic Cache Parameters Leaf') are:
> * It provides more information than the descriptors provided by cpuid(2)
> * It is not table based as cpuid(2). So, we will not need changes to the
> kernel to support new cache descriptors in the descriptor table (as is the
> case with cpuid(2)).
>
> The patch also adds a bunch of interfaces under
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cache, showing various information about the
> caches.
Why does this need to be in kernel-space ? Is there some reason that prevents
you from enhancing x86info for example ? I really want to live to see the
death of /proc/cpuinfo one day, and reinventing it in sysfs seems pointless
if it can all be done in userspace.
> Most useful field being shared_cpu_map, which says what caches are
> shared among which logical cpus.
Given that the most useful field is of limited use to a majority of users,
and those that are interested can read this from userspace, this has me very puzzled.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-15 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-15 23:24 [PATCH] Reading deterministic cache parameters and exporting it in /sysfs Venkatesh Pallipadi
2005-03-15 23:36 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2005-03-16 0:10 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2005-03-16 10:29 ` Daniel Egger
2005-03-16 7:07 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 19:18 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2005-03-18 19:46 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050315233620.GC14380@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox