public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	Chris Morgan <cmorgan@alum.wpi.edu>,
	paul@linuxaudiosystems.com,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: kernel bug: futex_wait hang
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:30:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050322153021.GA7223@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111468549.3058.36.camel@mindpipe>

Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 04:48 +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > I argued for fixing Glibc on the grounds that the changed kernel
> > behaviour, or more exactly having Glibc depend on it, loses a certain
> > semantic property useful for unusual operations on multiple futexes at
> > the same time.  But I appear to have lost the argument, and Jakub's
> > latest patch does clean up some cruft quite nicely, with no expected
> > performance hit.
> 
> A glibc fix will take forever to get to users compared to a kernel fix.

Interesting perspective.  On my systems Glibc is upgraded more often
than the kernel.

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-22 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-22  3:59 kernel bug: futex_wait hang Lee Revell
2005-03-22  4:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22  4:25   ` Lee Revell
2005-03-22  4:46     ` Jamie Lokier
2005-03-22  4:48   ` Jamie Lokier
2005-03-22  5:08     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22  5:30       ` Lee Revell
2005-03-22  6:34         ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-03-22 23:58           ` Lee Revell
2005-03-23 13:12             ` paul
2005-03-23 13:43               ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-03-22  5:15     ` Lee Revell
2005-03-22 15:30       ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2005-03-22 23:18         ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050322153021.GA7223@mail.shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cmorgan@alum.wpi.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paul@linuxaudiosystems.com \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox