From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
mjbligh@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel <ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: OOM problems on 2.6.12-rc1 with many fsx tests
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:17:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050326001702.GA22347@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111607584.5786.55.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:53:04AM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> The fsx command is:
>
> ./fsx -c 10 -n -r 4096 -w 4096 /mnt/test/foo1 &
>
> I also see fsx tests start to generating report about read bad data
> about the tests have run for about 9 hours(one hour before of the OOM
> happen).
Is writing to the same testfile from multiple fsx's supposed to work?
It sounds like a surefire way to break the consistency checking that it does.
I'm surprised it lasts 9hrs before it breaks.
In the past I've done tests like..
for i in `seq 1 100`
do
fsx foo$i &
done
to make each process use a different test file.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-26 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-15 20:44 OOM problems with 2.6.11-rc4 Noah Meyerhans
2005-03-15 21:56 ` Sean
2005-03-15 22:12 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-15 23:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 16:12 ` Noah Meyerhans
2005-04-13 13:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-14 16:56 ` Noah Meyerhans
2005-03-16 0:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-16 11:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-16 12:04 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 12:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 18:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-16 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 19:53 ` OOM problems on 2.6.12-rc1 with many fsx tests Mingming Cao
2005-03-23 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 23:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-03-23 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 23:26 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-03-23 23:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-03-23 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 23:49 ` [Ext2-devel] " Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-24 1:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-24 2:00 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-25 21:56 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-25 22:11 ` [Ext2-devel] " Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-27 0:23 ` Mingming Cao
2005-03-27 19:22 ` Mingming Cao
2005-03-27 20:06 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-27 20:17 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-26 0:17 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2005-03-26 0:20 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-04-04 1:35 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-04 16:50 ` Mingming Cao
2005-04-04 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-04 20:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-04-04 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-05 17:04 ` [Ext2-devel] " Mingming Cao
2005-04-06 1:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-12 12:50 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-04-05 16:44 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-03-16 12:23 ` OOM problems with 2.6.11-rc4 Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 12:30 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050326001702.GA22347@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjbligh@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox