From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ARM] Group device drivers together under their own menu
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:45:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050327004549.GS21986@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050326225026.D23306@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 10:50:26PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:41:41PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Any reason you can't merge ARM's options into the drivers/*/Kconfig (with
> > appropriate conditionals) and use drivers/Kconfig?
>
> Dunno. Haven't gotten around to sorting that out yet, and I don't
> particularly fancy trying to fight any corners over it.
>
> I think, a while back, it was thought to be better to keep ARM separate
> to keep the conditionals out of drivers/Kconfig.
>
> If the general concensus has changed, I might eventually sort it out if
> it causes enough trouble, or people think there's sufficient value to it.
As the original author of drivers/Kconfig, I think it's a brilliant
idea that everybody should use ;-) I haven't heard any dissenting
opinions yet. The only complaint I've heard is that net/Kconfig is now
under device drivers. I didn't make that change, and I agree it sucks.
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-27 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200503261912.j2QJC192031517@hera.kernel.org>
2005-03-26 21:41 ` [ARM] Group device drivers together under their own menu Matthew Wilcox
2005-03-26 22:50 ` Russell King
2005-03-27 0:45 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2005-03-27 1:10 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-29 23:46 ` Ingo Oeser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050327004549.GS21986@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox