From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:58:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050327085814.GA23082@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111814065.24049.21.camel@mindpipe>
* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> Running for several days with PREEMPT_DESKTOP, on the Athlon XP the
> worst latency I am seeing is ~150 usecs! But on the C3 its about 4ms:
could you run a bit with tracing disabled (in the .config) on the C3?
(but wakeup timing still enabled) It may very well be tracing overhead
that makes those latencies that high. Also, we'd thus have some hard
data on how much overhead tracing is in such a situation, on that CPU.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-27 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-25 14:59 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10 Ingo Molnar
2005-03-25 22:33 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-25 22:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-26 5:14 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-27 8:58 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-03-30 5:16 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-30 6:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-29 22:31 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-30 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 8:55 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-25 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 10:47 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-00 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 12:13 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-01 12:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 14:42 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-01 15:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 15:52 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-01 16:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 21:26 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-01 17:31 ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-01 18:27 ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-01 18:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 19:21 ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-01 19:19 ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-01 19:22 ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-01 23:34 ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-02 1:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-02 2:30 ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-02 5:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-02 19:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-02 20:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-02 20:17 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-02 20:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-02 22:38 ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-02 20:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-02 20:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-02 22:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-03 0:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-04 20:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 20:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-04 20:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 21:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-04 22:51 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-04-04 22:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-04 23:09 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-04-05 7:57 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-04-05 15:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2005-04-04 23:06 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-04-05 5:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-05 9:25 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-04-02 23:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-02 20:10 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-05 7:19 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-05 19:06 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-05 19:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-08 15:22 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-08 17:15 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-08 20:15 ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-08 20:17 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-08 20:26 ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-08 21:00 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-08 21:36 ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-10 17:23 ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-10 17:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-10 17:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-10 17:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-12 18:17 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-21 7:35 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc3-V0.7.46-00 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-21 8:45 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2005-04-21 16:16 ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-21 19:54 ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-22 6:27 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc3-V0.7.46-01 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 15:48 ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-22 15:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 15:53 ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-22 15:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-26 17:49 ` Daniel Walker
2005-05-09 7:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 21:06 ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2005-04-22 21:15 ` Daniel Walker
2005-05-04 8:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 21:17 ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-30 23:28 ` Lee Revell
2005-05-04 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-04 15:05 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050327085814.GA23082@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox