Re: [PATCH] make Documentation/oops-tracing.txt relevant to 2.6 [was Re: OOPS running "ls -l /sys/class/i2c-adapter/*"-- 2.6.12-rc1-mm2]

Lee Revell
2005-03-25T22:01:12Z

On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 21:52 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:45:32PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 21:07 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:53:42PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 07:38 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > > > Users need to be re-educated _not_ to use ksymoops.
> > > >
> > > > How about changing the fscking docs to not tell users to use it?
> > >
> > > Would be useful. The "fscking" problem is that no one actually owns the
> > > documents, so there's no central focus to keep them up to date.
> > >
> >
> > Are you serious? So Documentation/sound/alsa/* isn't maintained by the
> > ALSA maintainers?
>
> Last I checked, Documentation/oops-tracking.txt wasn't under
> Documentation/sound/alsa. It seems obvious to me, but maybe it isn't
> obvious to others, as your message appears to suggest.
>

No, I just misread your message as "none of the docs are maintained"
rather than "oops-tracking.txt is not maintained".

> As far as the question of ALSA documentation being up to date, that's
> one set of directories in the kernel tree I've _never_ looked at, so
> can't comment. Sorry.
>

The ALSA docs are in fact up to date.

Lee