public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:02:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050403060200.GA1332@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050327143454.GJ4285@stusta.de>

On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Due to the patent situation at least in the USA, the exports of 
> kernel/rcupdate.c should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.

Based on -what- line of reasoning???  The obvious ones do not apply
to this situation.

These need to be put back.  Moving them to GPL -- but in a measured
manner, as I proposed on this list some months ago -- is fine.  Changing
these particular exports precipitously is most definitely -not- fine.
Here is my earlier proposal:

	http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110520930301813&w=2

See below for a patch that puts the exports back, along with an updated
version of my earlier patch that starts the process of moving them to GPL.
I will also be following this message with RFC patches that introduce
two (EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL) interfaces to replace synchronize_kernel(),
which then becomes deprecated.

Andrew, please apply.

						Thanx, Paul

Signed-off-by: <paulmck@us.ibm.com>

diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5-notyet/kernel/rcupdate.c linux-2.5/kernel/rcupdate.c
--- linux-2.5-notyet/kernel/rcupdate.c	Sat Apr  2 17:15:14 2005
+++ linux-2.5/kernel/rcupdate.c	Sat Apr  2 07:54:30 2005
@@ -465,6 +465,6 @@ void synchronize_kernel(void)
 }
 
 module_param(maxbatch, int, 0);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_bh);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_kernel);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(call_rcu);  /* WARNING: GPL-only in April 2006. */
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(call_rcu_bh);  /* WARNING: GPL-only in April 2006. */
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_kernel);  /* WARNING: GPL-only in April 2006. */
diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5-2005.04.02/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt linux-2.5-2005.04.02-01/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
--- linux-2.5-2005.04.02/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt	Sat Apr  2 07:48:46 2005
+++ linux-2.5-2005.04.02-01/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt	Sat Apr  2 21:16:24 2005
@@ -15,3 +15,16 @@ Why:	It has been unmaintained for a numb
 	against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev.
 Who:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
 
+What:	RCU API moves to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
+When:	April 2006
+Files:	include/linux/rcupdate.h, kernel/rcupdate.c
+Why:	Outside of Linux, the only implementations of anything even
+	vaguely resembling RCU that I am aware of are in DYNIX/ptx,
+	VM/XA, Tornado, and K42.  I do not expect anyone to port binary
+	drivers or kernel modules from any of these, since the first two
+	are owned by IBM and the last two are open-source research OSes.
+	So these will move to GPL after a grace period to allow
+	people, who might be using implementations that I am not aware
+	of, to adjust to this upcoming change.
+Who:	Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
+

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-03  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-27 14:34 [2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL Adrian Bunk
2005-04-03  6:02 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2005-04-04  8:18   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-04 21:49     ` Paul E. McKenney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-03 13:23 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050403060200.GA1332@us.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox