From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261841AbVDGHba (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:31:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261604AbVDGHba (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:31:30 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:53129 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261841AbVDGHbX (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:31:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:31:14 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Nick Piggin Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [patch] sched: consolidate sbe sbf Message-ID: <20050407073114.GD26607@elte.hu> References: <42549D76.9040701@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42549D76.9040701@yahoo.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nick Piggin wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > What do you think of the following patch? I won't send the > whole series again, I'll queue them up with Andrew if you > think this one looks OK (which is the only major change). this one looks good too. Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Ingo