Re: Re: Re: Kernel SCM saga..

Petr Baudis
2005-04-10T01:43:05Z

Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:01:12AM CEST, I got a letter
where Phillip Lougher <phil.lougher@gmail.com> told me that...
> On Apr 9, 2005 3:53 AM, Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
> > cause cache corruption) and added scripts gitcommit.sh, gitadd.sh and
> > gitlog.sh - heavily inspired by what already went through the mailing
> > list. Everything is available at http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/
> > (including .dircache, even though it isn't shown in the index), the
> > cumulative patch can be found below. The scripts aim to provide some
> > (obviously very interim) more high-level interface for git.
>
> I did a bit of playing about with the changelog generate script,
> trying to produce a faster version. The attached version uses a
> couple of improvements to be a lot faster (e.g. no recursion in the
> common case of one parent).
>
> FWIW it is 7x faster than makechlog.sh (4.342 secs vs 34.129 secs) and
> 28x faster than gitlog.sh (4.342 secs vs 2 mins 4 secs) on my
> hardware. You mileage may of course vary.

Wow, really impressive! Great work, I've merged it (if you don't object,
of course).

Wondering why I wasn't in the Cc list, BTW.

--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
98% of the time I am right. Why worry about the other 3%.