Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

Petr Baudis
2005-04-13T09:49:26Z

Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:38:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> told me that...
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> > > Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
> >
> > I tried this today, applied my patch for BE<->LE conversions and
> > glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached, still requires cleaning though),
> > and then tried git pull. Umm, whoops.
>
> Oh, and the other thing is:
>
> $ git pull
>
> GNU Interactive Tools 4.3.20 (armv4l-rmk-linux-gnu), 20:02:38 Mar 7 2001
> GIT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
> terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
> Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version.
> Copyright (C) 1993-1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> Written by Tudor Hulubei and Andrei Pitis, Bucharest, Romania
>
> git: fatal error: `chdir' failed: permission denied.
>
> "git" already exists as a command from about 4 years ago. Can we have
> less TLAs for commands please? That namespace is rather over-used and
> collision-prone.

I've already noticed GNU interactive tools (googling for git), but it's
Linus' choice of name. Alternative suggestions welcomed. What about
'gt'? ;-)

--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
98% of the time I am right. Why worry about the other 3%.