public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm2
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050411151832.GA1301@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050410224834.GK4204@stusta.de>

On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:48:34AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> kernel-rcupdatec-make-the-exports-export_symbol_gpl.patch
> add-deprecated_for_modules.patch
> add-deprecated_for_modules-fix.patch
> deprecate-synchronize_kernel-gpl-replacement.patch
> deprecate-synchronize_kernel-gpl-replacement-fix.patch
> change-synchronize_kernel-to-_rcu-and-_sched.patch
> 
> 
> Please drop these patches.

Please keep them!

> Using these symbols in non-GPL modules is a legal problem at least in 
> the USA except for IBM,

Again, based on what line of reasoning?  Again, the obvious lines
of reasoning do not apply.

>                         and all we've heard from IBM is that they are 
> not 100% sure that there is really no binary-only module by IBM that 
> might use these symbols.

>From my earlier message (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/4/244):

	Agreed, in that I know of no binary module that uses RCU.  However,
	I cannot -prove- that there is no such module.

IOW, I am also not 100% sure that there is really no binary-only module
using these symbols by -anyone-, including someone -other- than IBM.
In addition, I know of no way that -anyone- could possibly be 100% sure
that there is really no binary-only module using symbols.  Hence the
approach of providing the year "grace period" before transitioning to
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().

> The risk of anyne using them only increases (no matter that it's marked 
> as deprecated) as long as it's available - and nobody has until now 
> claimed that he's actually using one pf them in a binary-only module.

I am not convinced that the risk of usage increases significantly.
However, even if someone does start using them in a binary module, they
will have been warned.  Yes, someone could possibly ignore the warning.
They -still- will have been warned, so that any "damage" would be
self-inflicted.  Therefore, as noted earlier, the symbol transitions
to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() one year after its inclusion, regardless of any
people who ignored warnings.

							Thanx, Paul

> cu
> Adrian
> 
> -- 
> 
>        "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
>         of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
>        "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
>                                        Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-11 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-08 10:08 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-04-08 11:46 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-08 16:44   ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-08 12:25 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Indrek Kruusa
2005-04-08 14:11 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Jan Dittmer
2005-04-08 15:23   ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Paulo Marques
2005-04-08 14:14 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Jan Dittmer
2005-04-08 22:21   ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-04-08 15:17 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Alexander Nyberg
2005-04-08 17:28 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Alexey Dobriyan
2005-04-08 13:52   ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Martin Waitz
2005-04-08 23:28 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Jesper Juhl
2005-04-09  1:49   ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Adrian Bunk
2005-04-09  1:57     ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Jesper Juhl
2005-04-09 12:51       ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Adrian Bunk
2005-04-09 13:43 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Alexander Nyberg
2005-04-10 13:31 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Alexander Nyberg
2005-04-10 22:48 ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Adrian Bunk
2005-04-11 15:18   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2005-04-13  0:36     ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Adrian Bunk
2005-04-13  1:32       ` 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Paul E. McKenney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-08 11:50 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-04-10 15:06 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050411151832.GA1301@us.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox