From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261998AbVDLBMl (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:12:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261999AbVDLBMl (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:12:41 -0400 Received: from dsl092-053-140.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.53.140]:51348 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261998AbVDLBMj (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:12:39 -0400 From: Rob Landley Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Shawn Starr Subject: Policy question (was Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:09:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Pavel Machek , LKML , acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20050406212221.75716.qmail@web88010.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050406212221.75716.qmail@web88010.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504112009.30928.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 06 April 2005 05:22 pm, Shawn Starr wrote: > --- Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG > > > > option marked as Deprecated? :) > > > > Actually it should probably go through > > > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > > > ...and give it *long* timeout, since it is API > > change. > > Pavel Shouldn't all deprecated features be in feature-removal-schedule.txt? There are four entries in feature-removal-schedule in 2.6.12-rc2, but `find . -name "Kconfig" | xargs grep -i deprecated` finds eight entries. (And there's more if the grep -i is for "obsolete" instead...) Just wondering... Rob