From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261175AbVDMS3Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:29:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261176AbVDMS3Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:29:16 -0400 Received: from colin2.muc.de ([193.149.48.15]:58898 "EHLO colin2.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261175AbVDMS3O (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:29:14 -0400 Date: 13 Apr 2005 20:29:13 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:29:13 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Matt Tolentino Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] minor syctl fix in vsyscall_init Message-ID: <20050413182913.GE50241@muc.de> References: <200504131745.j3DHjIVE017612@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504131745.j3DHjIVE017612@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:45:18AM -0700, Matt Tolentino wrote: > > Andi, > > If CONFIG_SYCTL is not enabled then the x86-64 tree > fails to build due to use of a symbol that is not > compiled in. Don't bother compiling in the sysctl > register call if not building with sysctl. Thanks. Actually it would be better to fix up sysctl.h to define dummy functions in this case. I thought it did that already in fact.... -Andi