From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261677AbVDRFVp (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 01:21:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261679AbVDRFVo (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 01:21:44 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:12493 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261677AbVDRFVg (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 01:21:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 06:21:35 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Takashi Ikebe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH i386] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7 Message-ID: <20050418052135.GA16630@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Takashi Ikebe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4263277F.6020206@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4263277F.6020206@lab.ntt.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:20:31PM +0900, Takashi Ikebe wrote: > The patch was over 50k, so I separate it to each architecture and in line.. > > This patch add function called "Live patching" which is defined on > OSDL's carrier grade linux requiremnt definition to linux 2.6.11.7 kernel. Traditionally beeing in OSDL specs was a very good reason not to merge patches. Can you please come up with real arguments instead of this requirements bullshit. Also I hope OSDL would invest their money in more useful things than CGL, why has this idiocy still not stopped?