From: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
To: paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PATCH [PPC64]: dead processes never reaped
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:38:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050418193833.GW15596@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
then being lost forever.
Processes that are PF_DEAD are cleaned up *after* the context switch,
in a routine called finish_task_switch(task_t *prev). The "prev" gets
the value returned by _switch() in entry.S, but this value comes from
__switch_to (struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *new)
{
old_thread = ¤t->thread; ///XXX shouldn't this be prev, not current?
last = _switch(old_thread, new_thread);
return last;
}
The way I see it, "prev" and "current" are almost always going to be
pointing at the same thing; however, if a "need resched" happens,
or there's a pre-emept or some-such, then prev and current won't be
the same; in which case, finish_task_switch() will end up cleaning
up the old current, instead of prev. This will result in dead processes
hanging around, which will never be scheduled again, and will never
get a chance to have put_task_struct() called on them.
This patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <linas@linas.org>
--- arch/ppc64/kernel/process.c.orig 2005-04-18 14:26:42.000000000 -0500
+++ arch/ppc64/kernel/process.c 2005-04-18 14:27:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
flush_tlb_pending();
new_thread = &new->thread;
- old_thread = ¤t->thread;
+ old_thread = &prev->thread;
local_irq_save(flags);
last = _switch(old_thread, new_thread);
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-18 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-18 19:38 Linas Vepstas [this message]
2005-04-19 1:01 ` PATCH [PPC64]: dead processes never reaped Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-04-19 17:39 ` Linas Vepstas
2005-04-19 1:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-04-19 1:25 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19 17:22 ` Linas Vepstas
2005-04-20 5:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-05-05 21:57 ` Linas Vepstas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050418193833.GW15596@austin.ibm.com \
--to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox