From: DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net>
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>
Cc: dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org>,
Xin Zhao <uszhaoxin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why Ext2/3 needs immutable attribute?
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:54:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050423225422.GB512@DervishD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba1e71adc21a7b85ac989786540aee87@mac.com>
Hi Kyle :)
* Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com> dixit:
> On Apr 23, 2005, at 15:12, DervishD wrote:
> > * Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com> dixit:
> >>>another usage: if you "chattr +i /var" while /var is unmounted,
> >>>then root is unlikely to accidentally create files/dirs in /var --
> >>>and when you mount the real /var on top it works fine. i tend to
> >>>protect all my mount points this way (especially those in /mnt) to
> >>>avoid my own dumb mistakes.
> >>If you chmod 000 /var beforehand (While it's still unmounted, of
> >>course), then it's also blindingly obvious that it's not mounted in
> >>an ls -l :-D. I too have used this trick on many/most of my
> >>systems.
> >I was doing exactly that, but it has its drawbacks: root still
> >can create files by accident. [...]
> Ah, I meant in combination with the above trick:
Oh, yes, I was meaning exactly that. I prefer to have '000'
permissions on directories that act as mountpoints just to see at a
glance whether they are mounted or not. You're right, the chattr +i
is just another protection, not a simple visual one ;)
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado
--
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.dervishd.net & http://www.pleyades.net/
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-23 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-17 15:54 Why Ext2/3 needs immutable attribute? Xin Zhao
2005-04-17 16:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-04-17 16:12 ` Xin Zhao
2005-04-17 16:23 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-17 16:27 ` Willy TARREAU
2005-04-17 19:47 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-17 23:48 ` Xin Zhao
2005-04-18 1:53 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-17 19:45 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-23 16:50 ` dean gaudet
2005-04-23 18:33 ` DervishD
2005-04-23 18:49 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-23 19:12 ` DervishD
2005-04-23 20:37 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-23 22:54 ` DervishD [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050423225422.GB512@DervishD \
--to=lkml@dervishd.net \
--cc=dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=uszhaoxin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox