From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261319AbVDZFJw (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:09:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261320AbVDZFJw (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:09:52 -0400 Received: from smtp.istop.com ([66.11.167.126]:12469 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261319AbVDZFJv (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:09:51 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: Jesper Juhl Subject: Re: [PATCH 1a/7] dlm: core locking Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:10:00 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: David Teigland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org References: <20050425165705.GA11938@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504260110.01115.phillips@istop.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 25 April 2005 17:17, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > +     int error = -ENOMEM, last_len, count = 0; > > Wouldn't >         int error = -ENOMEM; >         int last_len; >         int count = 0; > be a bit more readable? The rest of your nits are fine, upstanding nits, but this one seems a little extreme :-) Regards, Daniel