From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261342AbVDZFtL (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:49:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261340AbVDZFtK (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:49:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:41856 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261332AbVDZFsx (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:48:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:52:35 +0800 From: David Teigland To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] dlm: build Message-ID: <20050426055235.GD12096@redhat.com> References: <20050425151333.GH6826@redhat.com> <20050425142525.70e72e93.akpm@osdl.org> <200504260352.j3Q3qGEP010127@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504260352.j3Q3qGEP010127@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:52:15PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:25:25 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > > David Teigland wrote: > > > > > > +config DLM > > > Shouldn't it enable SCTP? Depend on NET? > > Looks like it. As a related question, is the SCTP dependency something > fairly innate to the design, or would layering it over other low-level > transports in the future be a possibility? A first glance makes it look > like only lowcomms.c and maybe midcomms.c would be affected. Thanks, the suggestions so far have been very good and we're working on them. Other transports are definately a possibility and something that should be quite simple since it's all encapsulated in lowcomms as you've mentioned. Dave