From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>,
Alexander Nyberg <alexn@dsv.su.se>,
Parag Warudkar <kernel-stuff@comcast.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: X86_64: 2.6.12-rc3 spontaneous reboot
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:53:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050426145351.GD13305@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <426E5571.8000101@trash.net>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:51:29PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >Hmm actually - on some systems I broke the NMI watchdog. Can you
> >check your dmesg to see if check_nmi_watchdog doesnt report it
> >as stuck? If yes please put a return on top of check_nmi_watchdog
> >that should fix it. You can verify it works by looking at the
> >per CPU NMI counters in /proc/interrupts. An nmi watchdog
> >backtrace would be nice to see.
>
> No occurences of check_nmi_watchdog in dmesg or my logs, just
> "Using local APIC NMI watchdog using perfctr0". /proc/interrupts
> shows:
>
> NMI: 181
It is Checking NMI watchdog .... if you see "stuck" after that it is
broken. Or do the NMIs actually increase when you make the machine
busy (run while true ; do true ; done on each CPU)?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-26 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-24 4:08 X86_64: 2.6.12-rc3 spontaneous reboot Parag Warudkar
2005-04-24 8:41 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-04-24 13:03 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-04-24 13:35 ` ismail dönmez
2005-04-25 8:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-25 15:35 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-25 18:14 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-04-26 0:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-26 8:26 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-04-26 13:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-26 13:53 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-26 13:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-26 14:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-26 14:22 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-26 14:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-26 14:53 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-04-26 15:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-27 12:59 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-27 22:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-26 20:28 ` Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-24 21:58 Parag Warudkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050426145351.GD13305@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=alexn@dsv.su.se \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kernel-stuff@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomlins@cam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox