From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261578AbVD0NFD (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:05:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261591AbVD0NFD (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:05:03 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:33427 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261578AbVD0NFA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:05:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:04:59 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Vincent Hanquez Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6][XEN][x86_64] Add macro for debugreg Message-ID: <20050427130459.GI13305@wotan.suse.de> References: <20050426113149.GE26614@snarc.org> <20050426131707.GB5098@wotan.suse.de> <20050426152638.GA23714@snarc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050426152638.GA23714@snarc.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 05:26:38PM +0200, Vincent Hanquez wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:17:07PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > It looks good, except that the name of the macro is too long. > > I will queue it and fix the name up when I apply. > > fine. let me know the new name, I'll regenerate a new set of patch for > x86 too. It's probably better to have the same name between the 2 archs. Just dropping the cpu_ should be enough. -Andi