From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@istop.com>
To: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1b/7] dlm: core locking
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:52:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504272252.55525.phillips@istop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050427134142.GZ4431@marowsky-bree.de>
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 09:41, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> ...I assume that the delivery of a "node down" membership event
> implies that said node also has been fenced.
>
> So we can't deliver it raw membership events. Noted.
Just to pick a nit: there is no way to be sure a membership event might not
still be on the way to the dead node, however the rest of the cluster knows
the node is dead and can ignore it, in theory. (In practice, only (g)dlm and
gfs are well glued into the cman membership protocol, and other components,
e.g., cluster block devices and applications, need to be looked at with
squinty eyes.)
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-28 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-25 16:58 [PATCH 1b/7] dlm: core locking David Teigland
2005-04-25 18:34 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-04-25 20:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-25 22:27 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-04-26 1:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-25 20:41 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-04-26 5:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-25 21:54 ` Steven Dake
2005-04-26 5:49 ` David Teigland
2005-04-26 17:40 ` Steven Dake
2005-04-26 22:24 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-26 23:04 ` Steven Dake
2005-04-27 0:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-27 1:50 ` Steven Dake
2005-04-27 4:21 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-27 3:02 ` David Teigland
2005-04-27 13:41 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-04-27 14:26 ` David Teigland
2005-04-28 12:33 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-04-28 16:39 ` Daniel McNeil
2005-04-28 16:45 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-04-29 8:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-05-02 20:45 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-05-02 23:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-29 4:01 ` David Teigland
2005-04-29 22:58 ` Daniel McNeil
2005-04-30 4:29 ` David Teigland
2005-04-30 9:09 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-30 10:32 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-04-30 11:12 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-05-02 20:51 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-05-02 22:21 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-05-05 12:25 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-05-05 12:40 ` copy_to_user question linux
2005-05-05 13:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-05-05 19:29 ` [PATCH 1b/7] dlm: core locking Daniel Phillips
2005-04-28 2:52 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2005-04-28 12:37 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-04-28 23:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-28 6:49 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-28 12:55 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-04-29 0:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-29 2:52 ` David Teigland
2005-04-29 3:49 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-05-02 21:00 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-05-03 2:54 ` David Teigland
2005-04-27 12:33 ` Domen Puncer
2005-04-27 13:30 ` David Teigland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200504272252.55525.phillips@istop.com \
--to=phillips@istop.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=sdake@mvista.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox