Re: [PATCH] private mounts

Ram
2005-04-30T16:49:00Z

On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 01:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:07:34PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > ... is the same as for the same question with "set of mounts" replaced
> > > > > with "environment variables".
> > > >
> > > > Not quite.
> > > >
> > > > After changing environment variables in .profile, you can copy them to
> > > > other shells using ". ~/.profile".
> > > >
> > > > There is no analogous mechanism to copy namespaces.
> > >
> > > Actually, after you add right mount xyzzy /foo lines into .profile,
> > > you can just . ~/.profile ;-).
> >
> > Is there a mount command that can do that? We're talking about
> > private mounts - invisible to other namespaces, which includes the
> > other shells.
> >
> > If there was a /proc/NNN/namespace, that would do the trick :)
>
> I don't think you need a /proc/NNN/namespace, /proc/NNN/mounts already
> contains a mount table. It's pretty trivial to write a small shellscript
> to parse that, compare with the current namespace and do all mount/umounts
> to make them fit the other processes namespace. Real problem here are
> filesystems that don't implement ->show_options or do so only partially
> so that some options are lost.

The other problem is: How would new mounts in any of these namespaces
propogate to other namespaces owned by the same user?

I mean, how will the other namespace's belonging to the same user, be
able to pull the mounts into their namespaces? shared subtree won't be
a solution because these namespaces won't have a parent-child
relationship to begin with, for the propogation to be set up.

RP

>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html