Re: [PATCH] private mounts

Al Viro
2005-04-24T20:13:45Z

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:08:13PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Comments are appreciated. If there are no vetoes agains the patch, I
> think it's suitable for -mm.

Vetoed. Having suid application with different pathname resolution than
that of parent just because it is suid is not acceptable. I'm sorry,
but breaking hell knows how many existing applications is not an option.