From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10 of 12] Fix Tpm driver -- sysfs owernship changes
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:38:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050429163812.GA32647@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1114792213.20121.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:30:12AM -0500, Kylene Jo Hall wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 21:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 03:40:16PM -0500, Kylene Hall wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:19:03PM -0500, Kylene Hall wrote:
> > > > > - device_remove_file(&pci_dev->dev, &dev_attr_pubek);
> > > > > - device_remove_file(&pci_dev->dev, &dev_attr_pcrs);
> > > > > - device_remove_file(&pci_dev->dev, &dev_attr_caps);
> > > > > + for (i = 0; i < TPM_NUM_ATTR; i++)
> > > > > + device_remove_file(&pci_dev->dev, &chip->vendor->attr[i]);
> > > >
> > > > Use an attribute group, instead of this. That will allow you to get
> > > > rid of the TPM_NUM_ATTR value, and this looney macro:
> > > >
> > > > > +#define TPM_DEVICE_ATTRS { \
> > > > > + __ATTR(pubek, S_IRUGO, tpm_show_pubek, NULL), \
> > > > > + __ATTR(pcrs, S_IRUGO, tpm_show_pcrs, NULL), \
> > > > > + __ATTR(caps, S_IRUGO, tpm_show_caps, NULL), \
> > > > > + __ATTR(cancel, S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP, NULL, tpm_store_cancel) }
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ok, the patch below has the same functionality as the previous patch but
> > > gets rid of the macro and implements an attribute_group. Is there any way
> > > to avoid the repeated code in every tpm_specific file to setup the
> > > attribute_group and still ensure the files are owned by the tpm_specific
> > > module? The only thing I can come up with is either not using the
> > > TPM_DEVICE macro at all or creating with TPM_DEVICE macro and then
> > > changing the owner field.
> >
> > Why are you trying to split this driver up into such tiny pieces?
> > What's wrong with one driver for all devices?
>
> The driver was orginally all one piece and was split at the suggestion
> of Ian Campbell on this list.
Oh, I remember that. But if it turns out to be impractical...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-29 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-27 22:19 [PATCH 10 of 12] Fix Tpm driver -- sysfs owernship changes Kylene Hall
2005-04-28 4:19 ` Greg KH
2005-04-28 20:40 ` Kylene Hall
2005-04-29 4:28 ` Greg KH
2005-04-29 16:30 ` Kylene Jo Hall
2005-04-29 16:38 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-05 19:11 Kylene Hall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050429163812.GA32647@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kjhall@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox