From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 10:01:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050504170156.87F67CE5@kernel.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
I think the general opinion of posting patches as attachments
has changed over the last few years. Mailers have been getting
a lot better at handling them, even quoting non-message-body
plain/text attachments in replies.
Plus, a plain/text attachment message saved to a file can go
into 'patch' the same way that an inline one can.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
---
memhotplug-dave/Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 11 +++++++++--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -L Documentation/Submitting -puN /dev/null /dev/null
diff -puN Documentation/SubmittingPatches~submitting-patches Documentation/SubmittingPatches
--- memhotplug/Documentation/SubmittingPatches~submitting-patches 2005-05-04 08:07:25.000000000 -0700
+++ memhotplug-dave/Documentation/SubmittingPatches 2005-05-04 09:11:27.000000000 -0700
@@ -181,17 +181,24 @@ patches. Trivial patches must qualify fo
-6) No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments. Just plain text.
+6) No MIME, no links, no compression. Just plain text.
Linus and other kernel developers need to be able to read and comment
on the changes you are submitting. It is important for a kernel
developer to be able to "quote" your changes, using standard e-mail
tools, so that they may comment on specific portions of your code.
-For this reason, all patches should be submitting e-mail "inline".
+For this reason, the preferred way of submitting patches in e-mail is
+"inline", in the same part of the message with everything else.
WARNING: Be wary of your editor's word-wrap corrupting your patch,
if you choose to cut-n-paste your patch.
+Many maintainers will now accept patches submitted to them as
+text/plain attachments. Many mailers quote these attachements in the
+same way that they do for inline patches. But, some maintainers still
+prefer inlines and they are certainly the safest bet. In any case,
+never attach more than one patch to a single e-mail.
+
Do not attach the patch as a MIME attachment, compressed or not.
Many popular e-mail applications will not always transmit a MIME
attachment as plain text, making it impossible to comment on your
_
next reply other threads:[~2005-05-04 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-04 17:01 Dave Hansen [this message]
2005-05-04 17:10 ` [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy Jon Smirl
2005-05-04 17:54 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-05-04 18:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-05-05 8:12 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-05-05 16:43 ` Lee Revell
2005-05-05 17:31 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-05-04 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-05-04 17:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-05-04 17:16 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-05-04 17:25 ` Dave Hansen
2005-05-04 17:55 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-04 18:14 ` Dave Hansen
2005-05-04 19:21 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-05-05 19:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-04 17:58 ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-05-04 18:52 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-05-04 19:28 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-05-14 22:10 ` Domen Puncer
2005-05-04 17:59 ` John W. Linville
2005-05-05 1:09 ` Rik van Riel
2005-05-05 9:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-05-05 10:06 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-05-05 12:01 ` Paulo Marques
2005-05-05 21:34 ` Steven Cole
2005-05-06 1:31 ` Lee Revell
2005-05-06 4:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
[not found] <40vxU-1a1-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <40vRd-1os-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-05-05 2:36 ` Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050504170156.87F67CE5@kernel.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox