The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru
Cc: guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net, alexn@dsv.su.se,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jlan@engr.sgi.com,
	aquynh@gmail.com, elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc3-mm3] connector: add a fork connector
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:08:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050509140836.066008e0.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050509154809.19076fe0@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru>

Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
>
> > In the previous connector, cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32
> > __groups) called alloc_skb(size, GFP_ATOMIC). Now a third parameter is
> > used with cn_netlink_send() in order to call alloc_skb(size, gfp_mask)
> > with a specific gfp_mask. So, I'm using GFP_ATOMIC as the third argument
> > to keep the same behavior.
> 
> It was atomic there to allow non process context usage.
> Since do_fork() is executed in process context you can use GFP_KERNEL with 
> __GFP_NOFAIL  - it will guarantee memory allocation.

Please avoid using __GFP_NOFAIL.

__GFP_NOFAIL was introduced because we had lots of places in the kernel
which were doing:

try_again:
	p = allocate_something();
	if (!p) {
		/* A am too lame to handle this */
		delay_in_some_manner();
		goto try_again;
	}

__GFP_NOFAIL simply takes the above bad code and centralises it so it's
always done in the same way and so that it's easily greppable for.  But
it's still bad (ie: deadlocky) code.

Well-behaved code should notice the allocation failure and should back out
gracefully.


  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-09 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-09  8:07 [PATCH 2.6.12-rc3-mm3] connector: add a fork connector Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-05-09  9:31 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-05-09 11:38   ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-05-09 11:48     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-09 21:08       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-05-09 21:43         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-10 11:13           ` aq
2005-05-10 11:24             ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-09 12:00     ` Nick Piggin
2005-05-09 12:22     ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-05-09 12:43       ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-05-09 13:13 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-05-09 13:32   ` aq
2005-05-09 13:57   ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-05-11 11:44     ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-05-10 11:18   ` Guillaume Thouvenin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050509140836.066008e0.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alexn@dsv.su.se \
    --cc=aquynh@gmail.com \
    --cc=elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net \
    --cc=jlan@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox