From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261547AbVEOI1Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 May 2005 04:27:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261548AbVEOI1Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 May 2005 04:27:16 -0400 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:42510 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261547AbVEOI1L (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 May 2005 04:27:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 10:27:06 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Andres Salomon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Status of net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_icmp.c? Message-ID: <20050515082706.GK16549@stusta.de> References: <20050513041622.GE3603@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:09:01PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Fri, 13 May 2005 06:16:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > can anyone explain the status of? > > > > This file is always included in the kernel if CONFIG_IP_VS=y, but it's > > completely unused. > > > > Will it be made working in the forseeable future or is it a candidate > > for removal? > > > > TIA > > Adrian > > The people/places to ask would probably be: > > IPVS > P: Wensong Zhang > M: wensong@linux-vs.org > P: Julian Anastasov > M: ja@ssi.bg > S: Maintained >... And these are exactly the people in the To-header of the email asking this question. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed