From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Reiner Sailer <sailer@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: crypto api initialized late
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:03:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050516200317.GD23013@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.63.0505161359560.840@laptop>
* Reiner Sailer (sailer@us.ibm.com) wrote:
>
> I am writing a Linux Security Module that needs SHA1 support very early in
> the kernel startup (before any fs are mounted,modules are loaded, or
> files are mapped; including initrd). Therefore, I use the __initcall
> to initialize the security module. SHA1 can currently be used only
> through the crypto-api (static definitions and hidden context structure).
>
> This crypto-API, however, initializes AFTER the security module
> code in the __initicall block. Currently, I use the following patch into
> the main Linux Makefile to start up the crypto-API earlier:
>
> diff -uprN linux-2.6.12-rc3_orig/Makefile
> linux-2.6.12-rc3-ima-newpatch/Makefile
> --- linux-2.6.12-rc3_orig/Makefile 2005-04-20 20:03:12.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.12-rc3-ima-newpatch/Makefile 2005-05-11
> 15:18:32.000000000 -0400
> @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ export MODLIB
>
>
> ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> -core-y += kernel/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/
> +core-y += kernel/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ crypto/ security/
I'm surprised this helps at all. Does this mean you are not using
security_initcall() in your module?
thanks,
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-16 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-16 19:15 crypto api initialized late Reiner Sailer
2005-05-16 20:03 ` Chris Wright [this message]
[not found] ` <OFBC11B5F7.2600BE34-ON85257003.006F5006-85257003.0070115B@us.ibm.com>
2005-05-16 20:40 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-16 20:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-16 20:30 Reiner Sailer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050516200317.GD23013@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sailer@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox