From: mjt@nysv.org (Markus Törnqvist)
To: Carlos Carvalho <carlos@fisica.ufpr.br>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, AndrewMorton <akpm@osdl.org>,
ck@vds.kolivas.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:30:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050518113016.GL1399@nysv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17033.62480.218289.246488@fisica.ufpr.br>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 574 bytes --]
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:39:28AM -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>That's a pity. What's more important however is that this misfeature
>of the scheduler should be corrected ASAP. The nice control is a
>traditional UNIX characteristic and it should have higher priority in
>the patch inclusion queue than other scheduler improvements.
Linux is not a traditional unix, but it doesn't mean the support
shouldn't exist.
My suggestion is that whoever broke the interface, rendering
con's patch which mingo accepted useless, merge the patch.
Thanks!
--
mjt
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-18 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-07 13:42 [PATCH] implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP Con Kolivas
2005-05-07 17:59 ` Carlos Carvalho
2005-05-07 21:45 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-09 11:24 ` Markus Törnqvist
2005-05-09 11:28 ` [ck] " Markus Törnqvist
2005-05-09 11:47 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-09 18:55 ` Markus Törnqvist
2005-05-09 23:54 ` Carlos Carvalho
2005-05-11 2:56 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-11 3:04 ` [SMP NICE] [PATCH 1/2] SCHED: Implement " Con Kolivas
2005-05-11 3:05 ` [SMP NICE] [PATCH 2/2] SCHED: Make SMP nice a config option Con Kolivas
2005-05-11 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-12 10:49 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-16 11:33 ` [SMP NICE] [PATCH] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP Con Kolivas
2005-05-16 18:31 ` Markus Törnqvist
2005-05-17 13:39 ` Carlos Carvalho
2005-05-18 11:30 ` Markus Törnqvist [this message]
2005-05-18 13:45 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-21 5:00 ` Con Kolivas
2005-05-23 9:28 ` [PATCH] SCHED: change_prio_bias_only_if_queued Con Kolivas
2005-05-23 10:07 ` [PATCH] SCHED: account_rt_tasks_in_prio_bias Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050518113016.GL1399@nysv.org \
--to=mjt@nysv.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=carlos@fisica.ufpr.br \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox