From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262354AbVERWCG (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2005 18:02:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262378AbVERWCG (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2005 18:02:06 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:13583 "EHLO mail.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262354AbVERWBj (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2005 18:01:39 -0400 Date: 19 May 2005 00:01:38 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 00:01:38 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Bill Davidsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What is needed to boot 2.6 on opteron dual core Message-ID: <20050518220138.GC34459@muc.de> References: <213219CA6232F94E989A9A5354135D2F0936FE@frqexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net> <428BB602.2040909@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <428BB602.2040909@tmr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Could you clarify that? I have to install one when it comes in to the > owner, and I'm not sure how you would do "runtime tuning" if it doesn't > boot. Did you mean boot parameters, BIOS diddling, or ??? What I meant to say is that all kernels should run on dual cores, but newer ones likely have better performance. Nothing to do for the user. -Andi