From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, discuss@x86-64.org, shaohua.li@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] CPU hot-plug support for x86_64
Date: 23 May 2005 18:38:16 +0200
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 18:38:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050523163816.GA39821@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050520223417.532048000@csdlinux-2.jf.intel.com>
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:16:24PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> Experimental CPU hotplug patch for x86_64
> -----------------------------------------
> - Most of init code that needs to be there for hotplug marked now as __devinit
> (Didn't use cpuinit, simply because the main framework code in kernel
> is not the same way, just trying to be consistent)
I dont like that. Can you keep it as __cpuinit please? e.g.
if cpuhot plug turns out to be a lot of code we could later
mark it free when we detect at boot the system does not support
cpu hotplug. With devinit that is pretty much impossible these days.
Also it is better for documentation purposes.
Havent read the full patch yet sorry, but it seems to mostly
consist of these changes anyways?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-23 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-20 22:16 [patch 0/4] CPU hot-plug support for x86_64 Ashok Raj
2005-05-20 22:16 ` [patch 1/4] " Ashok Raj
2005-05-20 22:16 ` [patch 2/4] " Ashok Raj
2005-05-23 16:38 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-05-23 16:58 ` Ashok Raj
2005-05-23 17:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-23 17:32 ` Ashok Raj
2005-05-23 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-05-24 11:49 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-20 22:16 ` [patch 3/4] " Ashok Raj
2005-05-20 22:16 ` [patch 4/4] " Ashok Raj
2005-05-23 16:40 ` [patch 0/4] " Andi Kleen
2005-05-23 16:54 ` Ashok Raj
2005-05-23 17:12 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-23 17:40 ` [discuss] " Ashok Raj
2005-05-24 5:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-05-24 6:01 ` Ashok Raj
2005-05-24 8:53 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-05-24 18:17 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-24 11:50 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-24 11:48 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-24 17:01 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050523163816.GA39821@muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox