From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262013AbVEXMPs (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 08:15:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262012AbVEXMPr (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 08:15:47 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:58628 "EHLO mail.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262013AbVEXMPo (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 08:15:44 -0400 Date: 24 May 2005 14:15:42 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:15:42 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Ashok Raj Cc: akpm@osdl.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, rusty@rustycorp.com.au, vatsa@in.ibm.com, shaohua.li@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] CPU Hotplug support for X86_64 Message-ID: <20050524121542.GA86182@muc.de> References: <20050524081113.409604000@csdlinux-2.jf.intel.com> <20050524081304.011927000@csdlinux-2.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050524081304.011927000@csdlinux-2.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:11:14AM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote: > * RED-PEN audit/test this more. I bet there is more state messed up here. > */ > -static __cpuinit void disable_smp(void) > +static __init void disable_smp(void) Why all these cpuinit->init changes? I think they should stay __cpuinit The other way round looks ok. -Andi